Meet the hedge funds trying to profit from California’s electricity crisis

It never ceases to amaze me (1) how antisocial some hedge funds are in their investment strategies, and (2) how they continue to find investors for their batshit strategies, which often end up backfiring spectacularly.

In Puerto Rico’s insolvency, you had hedge funds who were hiring public relations monkeys to try to make the case that repaying bondholders on “extra-constitutional” debt (i.e. bonds that made the territory exceed provisions in its constitution that restricted the amount of debt the territory could take on, otherwise known as bonds that were illegally authorized) was more important than Puerto Rico having operational schools and hospitals. I’m not kidding, they were actually saying stuff like this. So convinced were they of this strategy that they just humiliated themselves before the United States Supreme Court.

Fast-forward to the new hotness in hedge funds trying to profit from taxpayers’ misery: California’s electricity crisis. A cluster of hedge funds (Abrams Capital Management LP, Baupost Group LLC, Elliott Management Corp., and Värde Partners) sucked up bankrupt PG&E’s nearly worthless stock and outstanding bonds. Readers will remember that Elliott Management Corp. is the hedge fund that (along with Pimco) is looking at buying PG&E.

Now, this might seem like a counter-intuitive bet to you. Why would hedge funds want to buy up the the debt of a broke company with shitty infrastructure that starts fires and would take a thousand years of construction and $243 billion to move underground? On its face, that seems like a pretty good way to lose money, and it is. Investors in PG&E stocks and bonds have lost over $4 billion since the Kincaid fire began a few days ago.

So what were they trying to do, you ask? They were trying to profit from buying up PG&E’s insurance claims from previous fires at a deep discount and then as bondholders fighting for higher payouts in the bankruptcy court. I’m not kidding. (This isn’t the first time these funds have tried to profit from catastrophic infrastructure failures, either. Read on.) These investments were just the cost of admission into the court.

Before the Kincaid fire (and the two Lafayette fires also likely caused by PG&E equipment), it looked like these hedge funds were going to rake in hundreds of millions of dollars from this strategy:

Seth Klarman’s hedge fund Baupost Group LLC is poised to rake in profits from the bankruptcy of PG&E Corp. under an $11 billion insurance settlement, the endgame of an investment strategy launched months in advance of the California utility’s bankruptcy.

Public records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal indicate Baupost stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars from its investment in insurance claims tied to the wildfires that pushed PG&E into chapter 11. Under a proposed settlement unveiled Friday, those insurance claims will be paid back at roughly 59 cents on the dollar, roughly twice what Baupost paid for some of them, records show.

A Baupost spokesperson declined to comment.

PG&E filed for chapter 11 protection at the end of January, struggling under the weight of $30 billion or more in damage claims from wildfires in 2017 and 2018 that were later linked to its equipment. Court records show that between $18.6 billion and $20 billion of PG&E’s total wildfire bill stem from the insurance proceeds paid out to cover wildfire-related property damage.

Those insurers, in turn, are some of the largest claimants to be paid off as a prerequisite to PG&E’s exit from bankruptcy.

Uncertainty about PG&E’s future has sparked active trading in the company’s stocks and bonds as Wall Street traders staked out bets on how much the company could pay. But Baupost also spotted an opportunity in the relatively obscure corner of insurance claims, according to records maintained by California insurance regulators.

The exact amount Baupost stands to make couldn’t be learned. As of March it owned $2.5 billion in insurance claims, according to court documents. It bought the claims at steep discounts as early as last year from insurers anxious to shift the wildfire losses off their books, the records show.

Regulatory records from one major insurer, CSAA Insurance Exchange, say Baupost paid 30 cents on the dollar to 35 cents on the dollar for a significant number of California wildfire claims in late 2018 and early 2019, as it rolled up a stake in PG&E insurance claims.

On Friday, PG&E announced a settlement that puts the recovery for insurers at closer to 60 cents on the dollar, an improvement for those claims relative to the utility’s initial offer and a potential windfall for Baupost if the restructuring proposal is confirmed in court.

Under the placeholder chapter 11 plan PG&E filed earlier this week, insurers who paid off some of PG&E’s fire damages were being offered $8.5 billion. A PG&E spokesperson said the new deal was an “agreement in principle” and the company would announce additional details when a full written settlement is reached.

Baupost has demonstrated a knack for finding unusual ways to make money from corporate collapses. When nuclear plant builder Westinghouse Electric Co. went bankrupt in 2017, Baupost negotiated a deal to buy claims against the company from its parent Toshiba Corp. , eventually walking away with $400 million or more in profits.

Of course, liabilities from additional fires – especially a massive fire that has burned an area more than twice the size of San Francisco and taken out hundreds of structures – will decrease the pot of money available to pay out to these hedge funds.

As a ratepayer, doesn’t it thrill you that the people looking to buy your utility are engaged in behavior like this? And you have a milquetoast governor who probably doesn’t have a clue.

5 thoughts on “Meet the hedge funds trying to profit from California’s electricity crisis

  1. The hedge funds apparently have better (cheaper?) legal than the insurance companies who wanted to sell off those liabilities. It might all be to the good in the end if the insurance companies needed to stabilize losses in other divisions. I’m not sure that this is about “greed.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s